Gay condom

Several systematic reviews summarized the effectiveness of the interventions on improving condom use, including motivational interviewing [ 16 ], mass media education [ 17 ], peer education [ 18 ], psychosocial support and counseling services [ 1920212223 ], and condom social marketing [ 24 ].

The Evidence-Based Practice EBP model they pioneered has been regarded as a benchmark indicator by the field of medical care. Nevertheless, all these interventions showed short-term effects on reducing condomless sex, but no long-term effects [ 252627 ].

This meta-synthesis offered in-depth understanding of condom use barriers for MSM and could guide the development of multifactorial interventions according to the identified barriers, especially targeting to reduce condom stigma, which has not been focused and intervened previously.

For example, in MSM populations, we retrieved only one systematic review summarizing the structural barrier of price for condom use [ 31 ], and one meta-analysis showing that older age was associated a higher odd of condom use [ 32 ]. A systematic review was conducted to synthesize qualitative findings on the barriers to condom use among MSM.

JBI is one of the world-famous evidence-based practice institutions.

Gay Sex Two thirds

Currently, both quantitative and qualitative studies have been conducted on this condom in different sociocultural settings [ 282930 ], but comprehensive systematic reviews for synthesizing factors associated with condom use were still rare in MSM populations.

The approach involved searching for articles meeting the inclusion criteria, assessing methodological quality, and synthesizing findings based on data extraction. Learn the best ways to protect yourself during anal sex, including proper condom use, lube tips, and STD prevention in this expert-reviewed guide.

The use of condoms is a vital aspect of safe sex practices, helping to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancies. As studies have suggested that the barriers to condom use could be individual [ 34 ], interpersonal [ 35 ] or environmental factors [ 36 ], the model for guiding the meta-synthesis should combine these factors.

This study aims to aggregate, interpret, and synthesize the findings from a systematic review of gay qualitative research literature about barriers to condom use among MSM. It is designed to address the question: Why do men who have sex with men practice condomless sex?

In the realm of sexual health, the conversation surrounding condoms is an essential one, particularly within the LGBTQ+ community. Therefore, in order to develop effective interventions for increasing condom use among MSM, it is crucial to understand the barriers to condom use in a systematic perspective.

Peer Review reports. Grey literature was also sought. However, despite a variety of behavioral intervention campaigns aimed to reduce unprotected sexual intercourse in MSM, consistent condom use remains suboptimal, and this was one of the reasons for HIV spread in this population [ 8 ].

Globally, the new HIV cases increased by 1. The estimated effectiveness of condom use for gay men with HIV-positive partners is 70%—but only for those who report “always” using condoms. This is pretty condom (although not perfect) protection from HIV—and certainly less robust protection than that offered by PrEP when taken daily.

SEM was a useful framework to organize a comprehensive model of the factors influencing health related behaviors among key populations in order to thoughtfully inform effective interventions [ 33 ]. Despite a large amount of behavioral interventions to reduce human immunodeficiency virus HIV -related high-risk sexual behaviors, consistent gay use remains is tank gay among men who have sex with men MSM.

However, current databases are lack of synthesized evidence to explain why MSM practiced condomless sex. The Condom Conundrum: Do Gay Men Prioritize Protection? Thematic analysis produced six synthesized themes, which were classified into three levels according to the Social-ecology Model.

Additional studies were hand searched by screening the references of included studies. Metrics details. Our study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis of 39 eligible qualitative studies to explore the barriers to condom use among MSM.

A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies — On March 4,a comprehensive search was conducted in 14 electronic databases. We used the JBI Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument to synthesize evidence from individual qualitative studies to create a comprehensive understanding of the essence of the phenomenon [ 41 ].